| From: | Neil Padgett <npadgett(at)redhat(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords |
| Date: | 2001-08-15 20:23:51 |
| Message-ID: | 3B7ADA57.53465F4E@redhat.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Attached please find:
> >
> > the original proposal to encrypt pg_shadow
> > a diff of the current CVS
> > two new files (backend/libpq/md5.c and include/libpq/md5.h)
> > which implement MD5 encryption (from Vince with cleanups)
> >
>
> Patch applied. I have to move on to SCM patch.
Hmm... I used to be able to build in a separate tree than my source
tree. Since this patch was applied, I can't. It seems that the
preprocessor is finding the system md5.h (i.e. /usr/include/md5.h)
rather than the PostgreSQL md5.h. Suggestions on how to fix?
Neil
--
Neil Padgett
Red Hat Canada Ltd. E-Mail: npadgett(at)redhat(dot)com
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300,
Toronto, ON M4P 2C9
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-08-15 20:38:32 | Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords |
| Previous Message | Gerhard Häring | 2001-08-15 20:15:36 | Re: Fix for fetchone() and fetchmany() in Python interface |