Re: RE: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend)

From: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: "Henshall, Stuart - WCP" <SHenshall(at)westcountrypublications(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RE: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend)
Date: 2001-07-24 01:37:08
Message-ID: 3B5CD144.E2CD730D@tpf.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Henshall, Stuart - WCP" wrote:
>
> Would it be possible to offer an option for the OID column to get its value
> from an int4 primary key (settable on a per table basis maybe)?
> - Stuart
>

Sorry I don't understand well what you mean.
What kind of advantages are there if we let OIDs be optional
and allow such options like you offer ?

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bill Shui 2001-07-24 01:51:43 plpgsql.
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2001-07-24 01:23:08 RE: Re: unique index doesn't accept functions on fields