Re: Re: [INTERFACES] Postgres odbc driver bug

From: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Keith Millard <Kmillard(at)pumatech(dot)com>, PostgreSQL odbc list <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: [INTERFACES] Postgres odbc driver bug
Date: 2001-05-09 03:20:21
Message-ID: 3AF8B775.C63AE519@tpf.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces pgsql-odbc

Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > > And you are saying that this patch fixes a different problem. The user
> > > reported his problems were fixed by that patch, so I am inclined to
> > > apply it.
> > >
> >
> > I don't agree to apply the patch because the patch makes
> > the current code hardly understandable.
>
> Agreed. I mentioned to Keith I was going to clean it up before
> application. Here is the cleaned up patch.
>
> Hiroshi, what do you think?
>

Hmm that's not what I mean. The patch essentially means
that the STMT_PREMATURE state is unnecessary. Well why is
the concept *PREMATURE* introduced ? What meaning does the
stuff related to the concept *PREMATURE* have ? IMHO we
have to reconsider from the first.

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-05-09 03:24:44 Re: Re: [INTERFACES] Postgres odbc driver bug
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-05-09 02:58:08 Re: Re: [INTERFACES] Postgres odbc driver bug

Browse pgsql-odbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-05-09 03:24:44 Re: Re: [INTERFACES] Postgres odbc driver bug
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-05-09 02:58:08 Re: Re: [INTERFACES] Postgres odbc driver bug