Re: v7.1.1 branched and released on Tuesday ...

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: thomas(at)pgsql(dot)com, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk
Subject: Re: v7.1.1 branched and released on Tuesday ...
Date: 2001-04-30 15:02:08
Message-ID: 3AED7E70.80FED7E7@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

> > Nothing serious, but I would like to apply a patch to allow IDENT
> > strings (e.g. 'hour') to be accepted by the SQL92 EXTRACT() function. We
> > accept those for date_part(), which is what EXTRACT() is translated to
> > by the parser, and it seems to be a reasonable to the standard.
> But why does that need to go into 7.1.1?

Does not "need to". But it is non-invasive, extremely low risk, gets the
behavior to match the docs, and gets it off my desk and into the main
tree.

- Thomas

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marcin Zukowski 2001-04-30 15:30:04 Found an example prooving bug
Previous Message pgsql-bugs 2001-04-30 12:29:21 Date Conversion Bug

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-04-30 15:22:16 Re: Re: Any optimizations to the join code in 7.1?
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2001-04-30 13:41:53 Re: SAPDB Open Souce