Re: Re: Call for platforms

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org, Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, thomas(at)pgsql(dot)com
Subject: Re: Re: Call for platforms
Date: 2001-03-26 20:43:11
Message-ID: 3ABFA9DF.F2693503@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

> > > > SCO OpenServer 5 x86 7.1 2001-03-13, Billy Allie
> > > Where did you see this? I don't find it in the archives or in Vince's
> > > database.
> > In FAQ_SCO. I was looking to try to figure out what the differences were
> > between the SCO products :)
> I wouldn't necessarily count something dated Oct 9, 2000. That was half a
> year ago, and even two months before beta. And the message doesn't
> actually say it worked.

?? I can see I was thrown off by the "last updated:" line near the top
of the file. It actually comes from a CVS commit, not from an explicit
update of the info in the file.

Very bad :(

- Thomas

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Doug McNaught 2001-03-26 20:49:32 Re: Starting Postmaster
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2001-03-26 20:39:10 Re: Re: Call for platforms

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthias Juchem 2001-03-26 21:39:16 CVS tags for betas and release candidate
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2001-03-26 20:39:10 Re: Re: Call for platforms