Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Re: Call for platforms

From: Karl DeBisschop <kdebisschop(at)alert(dot)infoplease(dot)com>
To: lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org
Cc: thomas(at)pgsql(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: Call for platforms
Date: 2001-03-22 19:43:27
Message-ID: 3ABA55DF.B0E1E063@alert.infoplease.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> 
> > Solaris x86        7.0 2000-04-12, Marc Fournier
> >
> > scrappy, do you still have this machine?
> 
> Doing tests on Solaris x86/7 right now, will report as soon as they are
> done ...
> 
> > Solaris 2.5.1-2.7 Sparc 7.0 2000-04-12, Peter Eisentraut
> >
> > I'll bet that someone already has Solaris covered. Report?
> 
> Will do up Sparc/7 also this morning ...

In my tests on sparc/7 my compile died at line 3088 of
postgresql-7.1beta6/src/interfaces/python/pgmodule.c:

./pgmodule.c:3088: parse error before `init_pg'

That's line 3137 of today's (22Mar) snapshot, which reads:

/* Initialization function for the module */
DL_EXPORT(void)
init_pg(void)
{

I'm not a C expert by any means, but I can't figure how that is valid. 

Given my ignorance, I don't want to call it a bug. Plus we don't use the
python module in production, nor the sparc platform. But it seemed worth
pointing out.

-- 
Karl

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Giles LeanDate: 2001-03-22 19:45:02
Subject: Re: Re: Call for platforms
Previous:From: Steve StockDate: 2001-03-22 19:30:52
Subject: Re: initdb and data directories with lost+found

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Andy CorteenDate: 2001-03-22 19:45:41
Subject: Re: Birthday comparisons
Previous:From: Creager, Robert SDate: 2001-03-22 19:09:13
Subject: RE: using NEW in a trigger calling a function in plpgsql...

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group