Tom Lane wrote:
> Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> If you think it's easy enough, enlighten the rest of us ;-).
> > If postgres reported PGDATA on the command line it would be easy enough.
 
> In ps status you mean?  I don't think we are prepared to require ps
> status functionality to let the system start up... we'd lose a number
> of supported platforms that way.

That is one downside.  A major downside.  Again, alot of work to protect
the Barney Fife's out there.

> In the case of an actual crash and restart, postgres should come back up
> without help.  However, the situation here is not a crash, it is
> incomplete admin intervention.  I don't think that expecting the admin

Is it a correct assumption that this is the only time postmaster might
drop out?

But, thanks for the clarification, as I had misunderstood what you
meant.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11

In response to

• Re: How to shoot yourself in the foot: kill -9 postmaster at 2001-03-06 03:17:36 from Tom Lane

Responses

• Re: How to shoot yourself in the foot: kill -9 postmaster at 2001-03-06 03:33:49 from Tom Lane

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2001-03-06 03:31:05
	Subject: Re: How to shoot yourself in the foot: kill -9 postmaster
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2001-03-06 03:26:35
	Subject: Re: Re: pg_dump scripts are no longer ordinary-user friendly