Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: WAL & RC1 status

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-core(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WAL & RC1 status
Date: 2001-03-02 16:21:29
Message-ID: 3A9FC889.6C60E584@alumni.caltech.edu (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> I've been going through the WAL code, trying to understand it and
> document it.  I've found a number of minor problems and several major
> ones ("major" meaning "can't really fix without an incompatible file
> format change, hence initdb").  I've reported the major problems to
> the mailing lists but gotten almost no feedback about what to do.

Sorry for the "no feedback", but I've assumed that this will be more
productively discussed with Vadim in the loop. I don't disagree with
your observations, but of course that is from a position of happy
ignorance :)

> ... I want to veto putting out an RC1 until these issues are resolved...
> comments?

OK with me.

                    - Thomas

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: MatthewDate: 2001-03-02 16:22:58
Subject: RE: WAL & RC1 status
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-03-02 16:09:05
Subject: Re: WAL & RC1 status

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group