Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Java class documentation

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Java class documentation
Date: 2001-02-23 16:00:26
Message-ID: 3A96891A.951CDCC8@alumni.caltech.edu (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docspgsql-jdbc
> Could we for now remove the formal class documentation from the DocBook
> source, while keeping the narrative parts, and instead point people to the
> JavaDoc?  Could we make prebuild class documentation in HTML available to
> users, maybe where the jars are downloaded?

Works for me. Not sure if we have rules for building javadoc in our
makefiles, but I'm sure it would be easy to add if necessary. Peter M,
what do you think?

                     - Thomas

In response to

Responses

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Marc CullerDate: 2001-02-23 16:03:35
Subject: 404
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2001-02-23 15:47:46
Subject: Re: making docs ?

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Skidmore, WaltDate: 2001-02-23 17:00:14
Subject: f is not a valid bitstring
Previous:From: Peter T MountDate: 2001-02-23 15:23:53
Subject: Re: reteptools.jar

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group