Re: Java class documentation

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Java class documentation
Date: 2001-02-23 16:00:26
Message-ID: 3A96891A.951CDCC8@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-jdbc

> Could we for now remove the formal class documentation from the DocBook
> source, while keeping the narrative parts, and instead point people to the
> JavaDoc? Could we make prebuild class documentation in HTML available to
> users, maybe where the jars are downloaded?

Works for me. Not sure if we have rules for building javadoc in our
makefiles, but I'm sure it would be easy to add if necessary. Peter M,
what do you think?

- Thomas

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc Culler 2001-02-23 16:03:35 404
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-02-23 15:47:46 Re: making docs ?

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Skidmore, Walt 2001-02-23 17:00:14 f is not a valid bitstring
Previous Message Peter T Mount 2001-02-23 15:23:53 Re: reteptools.jar