Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: release date

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: release date
Date: 2001-02-12 06:46:00
Message-ID: 3A8786A8.EB0BB1B7@alumni.caltech.edu (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs
> > <chapter>
> >  <title>Release 7.0</title>
> >  <note>
> >   <title>Release date<title>
> >   <simpara>2000-10-12</simpara>
> >  </note>
> I kinda like having it in the title, actually, because that way the
> table-of-contents will show the release date history all on one page.
> I frequently find myself trying to guess which release cycle a given
> past date was in --- and AFAIK we have no handy reference anywhere.

Hmmph. I'd have guessed that memorizing seven dates would be the least
challenging thing you've accomplished in quite some time ;)

Anyway, I'll point out that we should try for appropriate markup
(whatever that is, but imho probably without dates in chapter titles),
and let Peter's upcoming style sheets solve any requirements for output
arrangement. 

Embedding dates in the titles is a short-cut to having a table of
release dates, which we should put somewhere in front of the release
notes chapters...

                     - Thomas

In response to

Responses

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-02-12 13:09:02
Subject: Re: release date
Previous:From: Jean-Pierre ParentDate: 2001-02-12 02:54:37
Subject: Dead link...

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group