Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To:
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc:
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Paul Govereau <pgoverea(at)akamai(dot)com>,
pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> I am strongly inclined to rip out the pseudo-UNDER clause and support
> only the old-style INHERITS syntax for 7.1. UNDER is adding no
> functionality and I think we will eventually regret using an SQL keyword
> for non-SQL semantics.
I agree with you, Hannu, et al. If it isn't making a good effort in
truely supporting SQL9x, then it isn't yet worth having in the parser.
- Thomas
