Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Re: Inheritance docs error.

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Paul Govereau <pgoverea(at)akamai(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Inheritance docs error.
Date: 2001-01-02 07:11:52
Message-ID: 3A517F38.8CE020E0@alumni.caltech.edu (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docspgsql-hackers
> I am strongly inclined to rip out the pseudo-UNDER clause and support
> only the old-style INHERITS syntax for 7.1.  UNDER is adding no
> functionality and I think we will eventually regret using an SQL keyword
> for non-SQL semantics.

I agree with you, Hannu, et al. If it isn't making a good effort in
truely supporting SQL9x, then it isn't yet worth having in the parser.

                    - Thomas

In response to

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-01-02 17:48:56
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Inheritance docs error.
Previous:From: Robert B. EasterDate: 2001-01-02 06:59:55
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Inheritance docs error.

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-01-02 07:16:53
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Re: PHP and PostgreSQL
Previous:From: Robert B. EasterDate: 2001-01-02 06:59:55
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Inheritance docs error.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group