Re: Shared Memory: out of memory

From: Joseph Shraibman <jks(at)selectacast(dot)net>
To: Alexaki Sofia <alexaki(at)ics(dot)forth(dot)gr>
Cc: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Shared Memory: out of memory
Date: 2000-12-20 02:41:33
Message-ID: 3A401C5D.AD66E52C@selectacast.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces

200000 tables is rather a lot. As I'm sure someone on hackers will tell
you, postgres is not designed to handle such bad database design.

Alexaki Sofia wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm working with the JDBC driver from the Postgresql 7.0.2 distribution.
>
> My application creates transactions consisting of about 3000
> updates operations ('insert into table' and 'create table').
> My database consists of a huge (200000) number of tables which
> form a hierarchy.
>
> The postmaster throws the following error massage
>
> >NOTICE: ShmemAlloc: out of memory
> >FATAL 1: LockAcquire: lock table 1 is corrupted
>
> What can have caused this error? How can I overcome it?
> Should I define the parameter -B of the postmaster?
>
> Thank you in advance
> Sofia Alexaki

--
Joseph Shraibman
jks(at)selectacast(dot)net
Increase signal to noise ratio. http://www.targabot.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-12-20 02:48:09 Re: Re: [HACKERS] Trigger
Previous Message Clark, Joel 2000-12-20 01:47:59 RE: Connection Pooling...(Repost)...please do help..