| From: | Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Vivek Khera <khera(at)kciLink(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Can PostGreSQL handle 100 user database? |
| Date: | 2000-11-30 18:59:20 |
| Message-ID: | 3A26A388.3BAF89AD@wgcr.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-sql |
Vivek Khera wrote:
> LO> The 2GB size limits of ia32 come in to play due to byte addressing
> LO> (versus word addressing) in ia32 plus the use of signed single register
> LO> two's-complement integers.
> LO> But, as always, I reserve the right to be wrong.
> You are wrong. The file size limit has to do with the data size of
> your file offset pointer. This is not necessarily a 32 bit quantity
> on a 32-bit processor.
If the file offset pointer is a signed integer, then it holds. That is
an OS specific issue as to the type of the pointer.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mr. Shannon Aldinger | 2000-11-30 18:59:22 | Re: Can PostGreSQL handle 100 user database? |
| Previous Message | Elmar Haneke | 2000-11-30 18:59:07 | Re: Can PostGreSQL handle 100 user database - more info |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mr. Shannon Aldinger | 2000-11-30 18:59:22 | Re: Can PostGreSQL handle 100 user database? |
| Previous Message | Adam Lang | 2000-11-30 18:57:32 | Re: Can PostGreSQL handle 100 user database? |