From: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Bierman <bierman(at)apple(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: darwin pgsql patches |
Date: | 2000-11-30 05:05:30 |
Message-ID: | 3A25E01A.ECE6884D@alumni.caltech.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
> >I think there is a semaphore-testing program in the QNX port; have you
> >looked at that?
> Yes, and it allowed the user to manually toggle semaphores, but I want to write something that will do more of a full regression sweep and produce a pass or fail result. (Which might be unnecessary if latest darwin kernels actually implement <sys/sem.h> completely, see below.)
> >> +#define darwin
> >Could we make this symbol __darwin__, or something else a little less
> >likely to conflict with plain names in the code? (For that matter,
> >doesn't the compiler predefine some symbol along this line?)
> The only symbols darwin gcc defines are:
> #define __MACH__ 1
> #define __NATURAL_ALIGNMENT__ 1
> #define __APPLE__ 1
> #define __GNUC_MINOR__ 95
> #define __ppc__ 1
> #define __GNUC__ 2
> #define __STDC__ 1
> #define __DYNAMIC__ 1
> #define __APPLE_CC__ 912
> #define __BIG_ENDIAN__ 1
> So defining one in PG via configure seems best.
Why not use "__APPLE__"? There probably isn't much hope of running
anything on a Mac with MacOS which isn't also darwin, right? Presumably
the gcc for LinuxPPC does not define __APPLE__??
- Thomas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2000-11-30 17:39:50 | Re: darwin pgsql patches |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2000-11-29 23:07:16 | Re: darwin pgsql patches |