Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Re: FWD: tinterval vs interval on pgsql-novice

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: FWD: tinterval vs interval on pgsql-novice
Date: 2000-11-28 18:20:42
Message-ID: 3A23F77A.AFEC7CBE@alumni.caltech.edu (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-novice
> > To fix this you simply need to double-quote "overlaps" when it's used as a
> > straight function call.  See how substring does it in pg_proc.h.
> Hmm. Why was this required for the substring() example? afaik all of
> this should be handled (correctly) in the grammar...

I see it now. Will look at it...

                   - Thomas

In response to

pgsql-novice by date

Next:From: Diego A. Puertas F.Date: 2000-11-28 20:15:54
Subject: Autentication and ODBC
Previous:From: Thomas LockhartDate: 2000-11-28 18:07:45
Subject: Re: Re: FWD: tinterval vs interval on pgsql-novice

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce GuenterDate: 2000-11-28 18:32:49
Subject: Re: 8192 BLCKSZ ?
Previous:From: mlwDate: 2000-11-28 18:20:34
Subject: [Fwd: Re: 8192 BLCKSZ ?]

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group