Re: Re: FWD: tinterval vs interval on pgsql-novice

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: FWD: tinterval vs interval on pgsql-novice
Date: 2000-11-28 18:20:42
Message-ID: 3A23F77A.AFEC7CBE@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-novice

> > To fix this you simply need to double-quote "overlaps" when it's used as a
> > straight function call. See how substring does it in pg_proc.h.
> Hmm. Why was this required for the substring() example? afaik all of
> this should be handled (correctly) in the grammar...

I see it now. Will look at it...

- Thomas

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Guenter 2000-11-28 18:32:49 Re: 8192 BLCKSZ ?
Previous Message mlw 2000-11-28 18:20:34 [Fwd: Re: 8192 BLCKSZ ?]

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Diego A. Puertas F. 2000-11-28 20:15:54 Autentication and ODBC
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2000-11-28 18:07:45 Re: Re: FWD: tinterval vs interval on pgsql-novice