Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Re: FWD: tinterval vs interval on pgsql-novice

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: FWD: tinterval vs interval on pgsql-novice
Date: 2000-11-28 08:06:49
Message-ID: 3A236799.D79B57D2@alumni.caltech.edu (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-novice
> (the second one fails). Now that I look, this breakage was introduced in
> March when "we" expunged operators allowed as identifiers (Tom Lane and
> I have blood on our hands on this one ;) See gram.y around line 5409.
> Suggestions?

Any problems with allowing OVERLAPS and BETWEEN as function names? bison
seems happy with no shift/reduce conflicts...

                      - Thomas

In response to

pgsql-novice by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-11-28 14:49:37
Subject: Re: FWD: tinterval vs interval on pgsql-novice
Previous:From: Rynell WessonDate: 2000-11-28 00:26:15
Subject: Re: Can not find -lpq

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: john huttleyDate: 2000-11-28 08:09:38
Subject: Re: Full text Indexing -out of contrib and into main..
Previous:From: john huttleyDate: 2000-11-28 07:53:42
Subject: Re: Full text Indexing -out of contrib and into main..

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group