> > > Maybe asking 'Why isn't the contrib full-text-indexer not in the main
> > > tree?' would be more productive on that front.
> > Well, yes. Why isn't it?
I believe that it is appropriate for contrib/ because it is a good demo
of FTI-like capabilities. But nothing more, yet. For at least a couple
1) It generates the "index" as a table, not a PostgreSQL index or
2) It has a hardcoded list of non-indexed words. This should come from a
table, to allow it to be tuned to the application requirements.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Samplonius||Date: 2000-11-28 06:38:35|
|Subject: Re: 8192 BLCKSZ ?|
|Previous:||From: Mitch Vincent||Date: 2000-11-28 06:26:10|
|Subject: Re: Full text Indexing -out of contrib and into main..|