> I have used the latest snapshot to create the following patches to provide
> support for Linux on S/390. As you can see the additions are trivial. The
> build went without a hitch.
Great! I've applied the patches to my tree, and Bruce or I will
propagate them into CVS. I've also updated our list of supported
We list platforms by "OS" and "Processor". What would be the correct
entries for S/390? Presumably S/390 is the processor, but I'm not
familiar with how IBM does their labeling...
> The regression tests went well with only geometry
> failing due to a difference in the 13th decimal place; and in inet for reasons
> I haven't explored fully.
I'll guess that the inet failures are due to differences in bit-shifting
behavior when generating masks. Will you have time to look at it? You
are probably already familiar with the tree, but if not look in
src/backend/utils/adt/ for the inet support.
In response to
pgsql-ports by date
|Next:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2000-11-17 16:35:28|
|Subject: Re: Linux for S/390 Patches|
|Previous:||From: Neale.Ferguson||Date: 2000-11-17 14:31:10|
|Subject: RE: Linux for S/390 Patches|