Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Re: to_date problems (Re: Favor for Postgres User at WSI)

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kate Collins <klcollins(at)wsicorp(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, John Rickman <john(dot)rickman(at)greatbridge(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Re: to_date problems (Re: Favor for Postgres User at WSI)
Date: 2000-11-12 16:10:14
Message-ID: 3A0EC0E6.5CDAFE35@alumni.caltech.edu (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
>  I don't worry, we have to_char/date already better than original
> Oracle's to_char() :-)

:)

Yes, and you'll find that the code will settle down and need very little
attention from here on. Our other date/time code has been around for 3
or 4 years now, and goes months without anyone even asking about edge
cases.

                       - Thomas

In response to

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Andrew McMillanDate: 2000-11-12 18:54:59
Subject: Re: Re: to_date problems (Re: Favor for Postgres User at WSI)
Previous:From: Karel ZakDate: 2000-11-12 11:18:14
Subject: Re: Re: to_date problems (Re: Favor for Postgres User at WSI)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group