Re: WAL status update

From: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Vadim Mikheev <vmikheev(at)sectorbase(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: WAL status update
Date: 2000-10-30 04:02:48
Message-ID: 39FCF2E8.F6B6A0EA@tpf.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Vadim Mikheev wrote:

> Hi, All
>
> First, as I've already mentioned in answer to Tom about DROP TABLE, undo
> logic
> will not be implemented in 7.1 -:( Doable for tables but for indices we
> would need
> either in compensation records or in xmin/cmin in index tuples. So, we'll
> still live
> with dust from aborted xactions in our tables/indices.
>

Does it mean that there would still be inconsistency between
tables and their indexes ?

Regards.
Hiroshi Inoue

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Larry Rosenman 2000-10-30 05:36:24 Re: another try
Previous Message Philip Warner 2000-10-30 03:40:09 Re: Re: I believe it will (was Re: Hmm, will this do?)