Re: pgsql/src/backend/nodes (copyfuncs.c outfuncs.c print.c)

From: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql/src/backend/nodes (copyfuncs.c outfuncs.c print.c)
Date: 2000-10-27 04:31:20
Message-ID: 39F90518.F7A206C4@tpf.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

> Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> > begin;
> > declare myc cursor for select * from t1 limit all;
> > fetch 20 in myc; (the first page)
> > ...(interaction)
> > fetch 20 in myc; (the next page)
> > ..(interaction)
> > fetch backward 20 in myc; (the previous page)
> > ...
>
> > What I expect here is to get rows of each page in
> > an average response time not the total throughput
> > of db operation.
>
> Yes, but why should the presence of "limit all" affect that?
> It's not apparent to me why the optimizer should treat this
> case differently from plain
> declare myc cursor for select * from t1;
>

Am I misunderstanding ?
Doesn't optimizer make the plan for the query
"select * for t1" which would use SeqScan
in most cases ?

Regards, Hiroshi Inoue

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-10-27 04:34:18 Re: pgsql/src/backend/nodes (copyfuncs.c outfuncs.c print.c)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-10-27 04:24:42 Re: pgsql/src/backend/nodes (copyfuncs.c outfuncs.c print.c)

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-10-27 04:34:18 Re: pgsql/src/backend/nodes (copyfuncs.c outfuncs.c print.c)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-10-27 04:24:42 Re: pgsql/src/backend/nodes (copyfuncs.c outfuncs.c print.c)