Re: pgsql/src/backend/nodes (copyfuncs.c outfuncs.c print.c)

From: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql/src/backend/nodes (copyfuncs.c outfuncs.c print.c)
Date: 2000-10-27 03:59:02
Message-ID: 39F8FD85.B99A99A0@tpf.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

> Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> > How would be the behavior of the following command sequence ?
>
> > begin;
> > declare myc cursor for select * from t1 limit 1;
> > fetch in myc;
> > fetch in myc;
>
> > Could the last fetch return a row ?
>
> As the code now stands, the second fetch would return nothing.
> I think this is clearly what any reasonable person would expect
> given the LIMIT 1 clause.
>

Different from ordinary select statements we could
gain the same result in case of cursors.

begin;
declare myc cursor for select * from t1;
fetch in myc;

For exaple,

begin;
declare myc cursor for select * from t1 limit all;
fetch 20 in myc; (the first page)
...(interaction)
fetch 20 in myc; (the next page)
..(interaction)
fetch backward 20 in myc; (the previous page)
...

What I expect here is to get rows of each page in
an average response time not the total throughput
of db operation.

Regards, Hiroshi Inoue

>
> LIMIT ALL is a different story, because there's no semantic difference
> between writing LIMIT ALL and writing no limit clause at all. We have
> the option to create a distinction for planning purposes, however.
> Question is do we need one?
>
> regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-10-27 04:24:42 Re: pgsql/src/backend/nodes (copyfuncs.c outfuncs.c print.c)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-10-27 03:36:19 Re: pgsql/src/backend/nodes (copyfuncs.c outfuncs.c print.c)

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lamar Owen 2000-10-27 04:07:16 PostgreSQL article in Linux Journal Nov 2000
Previous Message Lamar Owen 2000-10-27 03:48:56 Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?)