From: | Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pgsql/src/backend/nodes (copyfuncs.c outfuncs.c print.c) |
Date: | 2000-10-27 03:59:02 |
Message-ID: | 39F8FD85.B99A99A0@tpf.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> > How would be the behavior of the following command sequence ?
>
> > begin;
> > declare myc cursor for select * from t1 limit 1;
> > fetch in myc;
> > fetch in myc;
>
> > Could the last fetch return a row ?
>
> As the code now stands, the second fetch would return nothing.
> I think this is clearly what any reasonable person would expect
> given the LIMIT 1 clause.
>
Different from ordinary select statements we could
gain the same result in case of cursors.
begin;
declare myc cursor for select * from t1;
fetch in myc;
For exaple,
begin;
declare myc cursor for select * from t1 limit all;
fetch 20 in myc; (the first page)
...(interaction)
fetch 20 in myc; (the next page)
..(interaction)
fetch backward 20 in myc; (the previous page)
...
What I expect here is to get rows of each page in
an average response time not the total throughput
of db operation.
Regards, Hiroshi Inoue
>
> LIMIT ALL is a different story, because there's no semantic difference
> between writing LIMIT ALL and writing no limit clause at all. We have
> the option to create a distinction for planning purposes, however.
> Question is do we need one?
>
> regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-10-27 04:24:42 | Re: pgsql/src/backend/nodes (copyfuncs.c outfuncs.c print.c) |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-10-27 03:36:19 | Re: pgsql/src/backend/nodes (copyfuncs.c outfuncs.c print.c) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Lamar Owen | 2000-10-27 04:07:16 | PostgreSQL article in Linux Journal Nov 2000 |
Previous Message | Lamar Owen | 2000-10-27 03:48:56 | Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?) |