Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Unneccessary cmax in heap tuple ?

From: devik(at)cdi(dot)cz
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Unneccessary cmax in heap tuple ?
Date: 2000-10-26 10:48:33
Message-ID: 39F80C01.897896C7@cdi.cz (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> In situations like SQL function calls, it may be necessary to suspend
> a table scan while we go off and do other commands, then come back and
> resume the table scan.  So there can be multiple scans with different
> command IDs in progress within a transaction.

Ohh yes .. you are right. Thanks for explanation.
devik


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Larry RosenmanDate: 2000-10-26 12:07:53
Subject: --enable-multibyte dies (UnixWare 7.1.1)/Current Sources
Previous:From: Hiroshi InoueDate: 2000-10-26 05:57:50
Subject: Re: AW: AW: BLERe: AW: AW: relation ### modifiedwhile in use

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group