Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Re: [SQL] Q: spinlock on Alpha? (PG7.0.2)

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Ryan Kirkpatrick <pgsql(at)rkirkpat(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)hub(dot)org, pgsql-ports(at)hub(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Re: [SQL] Q: spinlock on Alpha? (PG7.0.2)
Date: 2000-10-11 05:51:59
Message-ID: 39E3FFFF.3CA214B7@alumni.caltech.edu (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-portspgsql-sql
> ... On top of that, I never quite figured out
> the alignment between the egcs and the gcc version numbers (i.e. how does
> egcs 1.1.2 relate to gcc 2.95.2?).

egcs-1.1.2 was internally labeled as 2.91.66.

                     - Thomas

In response to

pgsql-ports by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2000-10-11 17:13:30
Subject: Re: [ PGSQL for WIN]
Previous:From: Ryan KirkpatrickDate: 2000-10-11 04:41:11
Subject: Re: [SQL] Q: spinlock on Alpha? (PG7.0.2) - solved

pgsql-sql by date

Next:From: Oliver ElphickDate: 2000-10-11 13:42:05
Subject: Can I use subselect as a function parameter?
Previous:From: Ryan KirkpatrickDate: 2000-10-11 04:41:11
Subject: Re: [SQL] Q: spinlock on Alpha? (PG7.0.2) - solved

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group