Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Contributor List policy

From: Dan Langille <dan(at)langille(dot)org>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Contributor List policy
Date: 2008-03-10 22:41:45
Message-ID: 39E34999-51FC-4FD5-B548-0BE1969BD5F5@langille.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
On Mar 10, 2008, at 6:39 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> Andrew Sullivan wrote:
>
>> I think it'd be a bad idea to set up a big bureaucracy around all  
>> of this.
>> The next step on this road is to create an appeals process to  
>> address people
>> who've been taken off the list against their wishes.
>
> Don't worry -- there will be a nomination period for judges, and the
> community will vote for judges (who gets to vote is something still to
> be discussed).  The judge's decision will not be final though: you can
> appeal to the Appeal Committee (which will be a triumvirate elected by
> -core) if you don't like it.


Can we also get FSF involved here?  Surely they should be the last  
resort.

-- 
Dan Langille -- http://www.langille.org/
dan(at)langille(dot)org





In response to

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2008-03-10 22:42:14
Subject: Re: Contributor List policy
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2008-03-10 22:39:36
Subject: Re: Contributor List policy

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group