| From: | Dan Langille <dan(at)langille(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Contributor List policy |
| Date: | 2008-03-10 22:41:45 |
| Message-ID: | 39E34999-51FC-4FD5-B548-0BE1969BD5F5@langille.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Mar 10, 2008, at 6:39 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Andrew Sullivan wrote:
>
>> I think it'd be a bad idea to set up a big bureaucracy around all
>> of this.
>> The next step on this road is to create an appeals process to
>> address people
>> who've been taken off the list against their wishes.
>
> Don't worry -- there will be a nomination period for judges, and the
> community will vote for judges (who gets to vote is something still to
> be discussed). The judge's decision will not be final though: you can
> appeal to the Appeal Committee (which will be a triumvirate elected by
> -core) if you don't like it.
Can we also get FSF involved here? Surely they should be the last
resort.
--
Dan Langille -- http://www.langille.org/
dan(at)langille(dot)org
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-03-10 22:42:14 | Re: Contributor List policy |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-03-10 22:39:36 | Re: Contributor List policy |