Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pgsql is 75 times faster with my new index scan

From: devik(at)cdi(dot)cz
To: "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>
Cc: "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgsql is 75 times faster with my new index scan
Date: 2000-09-28 12:01:14
Message-ID: 39D3330A.6B7A8954@cdi.cz (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> > question is whether we need it for hash indices. it is definitely
> > good for btree as they support range retrieval. hash ind. doesn't
> > it so I wouldn't implement it for them.
> 
> We need in fast heap tuple --> index tuple lookup for overwriting
> storage manager anyway...
 
oh .. there will be such one ?



In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: devikDate: 2000-09-28 12:02:35
Subject: Re: pgsql is 75 times faster with my new index scan
Previous:From: Philip WarnerDate: 2000-09-28 09:09:45
Subject: pg_dump and sequences - RFC

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group