"Mikheev, Vadim" wrote:
> > > Btree doesn't take into account that tuple was just marked
> > > for update but still alive. Seems it was handled properly in 6.5.X ?
> > Nope. It has been broken a long time...
> Hmm, as I remember, Hiroshi fixed something in this area for 7.0.X.
> Probably, his fix somehow disappeared from CVS?
> Diff against 7.0.2 sources attached.
> 2 Marc - please add this to upcoming 7.0.3
Hmm,it seems that both current and REL7_0_PATCHES
have already been changed.
I committed the the change to current tree and
asked Tatsuo to commit it to REL7_0_PATCHES tree.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Mikheev, Vadim||Date: 2000-09-27 05:34:46|
|Subject: RE: RE: [GENERAL] update inside transaction violates unique constraint?|
|Previous:||From: The Hermit Hacker||Date: 2000-09-27 02:25:25|
|Subject: Recovery Procedures in 'single user mode' ...|