Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: RE: [GENERAL] update inside transaction violates unique constraint?

From: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>
Cc: "'Hannu Krosing'" <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>, "'Andrew Sullivan'" <sullivana(at)bpl(dot)on(dot)ca>, "'hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "'scrappy(at)hub(dot)org'" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RE: [GENERAL] update inside transaction violates unique constraint?
Date: 2000-09-27 05:34:43
Message-ID: 39D186F3.587CD0D6@tpf.co.jp (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Mikheev, Vadim" wrote:

> > > Btree doesn't take into account that tuple was just marked
> > > for update but still alive. Seems it was handled properly in 6.5.X ?
> >
> > Nope. It has been broken a long time...
>
> Hmm, as I remember, Hiroshi fixed something in this area for 7.0.X.
> Hiroshi?
> Probably, his fix somehow disappeared from CVS?
> Diff against 7.0.2 sources attached.
>
> Vadim
> 2 Marc - please add this to upcoming 7.0.3
>

Hmm,it seems that both current and REL7_0_PATCHES
have already been changed.
I committed the the change to current tree and
asked Tatsuo to commit it to REL7_0_PATCHES tree.

Regards.

Hiroshi Inoue



In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Mikheev, VadimDate: 2000-09-27 05:34:46
Subject: RE: RE: [GENERAL] update inside transaction violates unique constraint?
Previous:From: The Hermit HackerDate: 2000-09-27 02:25:25
Subject: Recovery Procedures in 'single user mode' ...

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group