Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: LIKE is still short some MULTIBYTE code

From: Joseph Shraibman <jks(at)selectacast(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: LIKE is still short some MULTIBYTE code
Date: 2000-09-15 20:26:38
Message-ID: 39C285FE.46CA773F@selectacast.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hasn't the [HACKERS] / [GENERAL] crossover thing been resolved yet?  I'm
not subscribed to hackers.

Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> I finished revising the LIKE operators back into an index-optimizable
> form.  But I notice there is some non-multibyte-aware code that needs
> to be fixed, specifically the pattern analysis routines in
> src/backend/utils/adt/selfuncs.c:
>         like_fixed_prefix
>         regex_fixed_prefix
>         like_selectivity
>         regex_selectivity_sub
>         regex_selectivity
> I don't have time to work on this now, but perhaps someone else would
> like to fix these...
> 
>                         regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Michael MeskesDate: 2000-09-15 21:08:15
Subject: Cannot compile
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-09-15 20:06:47
Subject: LIKE is still short some MULTIBYTE code

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group