Re: POSTGRESQL vs. ORACLE 8i &Sybase & Interbase etc

From: Chris <chrisb(at)nimrod(dot)itg(dot)telstra(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Emile D Snyder <emile(at)cosource(dot)com>
Cc: Ian Turner <vectro(at)pipeline(dot)com>, Eric Webber <streethockey(at)ureach(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: POSTGRESQL vs. ORACLE 8i &Sybase & Interbase etc
Date: 2000-09-01 02:38:12
Message-ID: 39AF1694.B70BBD64@nimrod.itg.telecom.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Emile D Snyder wrote:
>
> I know there's been a certain amount of buzz over the
> usefulness/methodology of the tests, but Great Bridge just published a set
> of tests using "Major Proprietary #1", ...#2, etc. kind of terminology.

Of which #1 may or may not be Oracle, and #2 may or may not be MSSQL.
:-)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2000-09-01 03:14:32 Re: referential integrity
Previous Message Stephan Szabo 2000-09-01 01:59:32 Re: referential integrity