Re: better way

Didn't test this, but I think it should also work:

SELECT a.oid_fld
FROM for_payment a, for_payment b
WHERE b.serial_fld = 2
AND b.char_fld = a.char_fld
AND a.serial_fld <> 2

--
Renato
Sao Paulo - SP - Brasil
rdg(at)viafractal(dot)com(dot)br

> Is there a better way to write this:
>
> SELECT a.oid_fld FROM for_payment a
> WHERE a.serial_fld <> 2
> AND EXISTS
> (SELECT b.char_fld FROM for_payment b
> WHERE b.serial_fld = 2
> AND b.char_fld = a.char_fld)
>
> Table for_payment
> +-------------+------------+-----------+
> | serial_fld | char_fld | oid_fld |
> +-------------+------------+-----------+
> | 1 | test1 | 456701 |
> | 2 | test1 | 456702 |
> | 3 | test1 | 456703 |
> | 4 | test2 | 456704 |
> | 5 | test3 | 456705 |
> +-------------+------------+-----------+
>
> sample problem:
> Assuming that I pick 2 in serial_fld.
> How do I get the oid_fld of the rows with char_fld equal
> to the char_fld of 2?
> I should get these:
>
> +-----------+
> | oid_fld |
> +-----------+
> | 456701 |
> | 456702 |
> +-----------+
>
> Thanks.