Re: [HACKERS] Pure ODBMS (fwd)

From: Chris <chrisb(at)nimrod(dot)itg(dot)telstra(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Wout de Jong <woutdejong(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Pure ODBMS (fwd)
Date: 2000-08-27 22:53:09
Message-ID: 39A99BD5.D6365D9@nimrod.itg.telecom.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers


My background project is to turn postgresql into a ODMG compliant object
database. But more work needs to be done!

Vince Vielhaber wrote:
>
> Forwarded from the webmaster mailbox, please be sure to include
> woutdejong(at)yahoo(dot)com in your responses.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 17:38:23 GMT
> From: Wout de Jong <woutdejong(at)yahoo(dot)com>
> To: "webmaster(at)postgresql(dot)org" <webmaster(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> Subject: Pure ODBMS
>
> Hi,
>
> I appreciate your effort in building this very nice piece of software.
> However, I'm building an app and not interested in translating all my
> objects into SQL. I think I found one solution called Pure Object
> DBMS. The only problem is that there is no open source variant
> available. Do you know of any initiatives in this direction from
> postgresql.org or other opensource groups? TIA for answering...
>
> Greetz, Wout
>
> _________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message andrew 2000-08-27 23:25:11 Re: table count limitation
Previous Message Tor Roberts 2000-08-27 22:45:53 aggregates of aggregates

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris 2000-08-27 23:11:49 Re: Performance on inserts
Previous Message Mitch Vincent 2000-08-27 22:01:02 Re: queries and inserts