Re: Inprise InterBase(R) 6.0 Now Free and Open Source

From: Chris Bitmead <chrisb(at)nimrod(dot)itg(dot)telstra(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Kaare Rasmussen <kar(at)webline(dot)dk>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Inprise InterBase(R) 6.0 Now Free and Open Source
Date: 2000-07-30 23:43:31
Message-ID: 3984BDA3.8C06AEC6@nimrod.itg.telecom.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Kaare Rasmussen wrote:
>
> > > The requirements seem to be pretty commonsense things...
> > > If you use some source code from Inprise, you've got to
> > > keep track of where the source came from, label it with
> > > their license, list any modifications you've made, always
> > > provide the source with any executables, etc.
> >
> > But the BSD license doesn't require source for distributed binaries.
> > Sounds like a GPL-style restriction.
>
> What is more important to my mind is if the license permits a developer to look
> at the code and get inspired, or if the developer's mind will be "tainted" just
> by looking.
> I hope someone can tell; I always wake up later with my head on the keyboard
> when I try to read license stuff...

I don't think the licence terms can have any effect on this. If you take
an idea from one code base and apply it to another code-bases with a
different licence, then the applicable law is going to be fair use. And
licence terms cannot affect fair use one way or the other.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Inoue 2000-07-31 00:22:36 RE: another ? lock freezing
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-07-30 14:53:41 Re: Problem with updating system indices.