Re: Re: [GENERAL] Some questions on user defined types and functions.

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Jeffery Collins <collins(at)onyx-technologies(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: [GENERAL] Some questions on user defined types and functions.
Date: 2000-07-28 14:41:11
Message-ID: 39819B87.78E04CF5@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

> If you want, I will make the change. If the restriction is desired, I can
> make the code in database.c and my code common.

Ooh. That sounds like a great offer. You are welcome to do the work :)

So, we will end up with a routine which will take a string, check for a
leading environment variable, and expand the envar if necessary? And we
will use that in two places?

istm that the above will require some memory allocation at times. I
haven't checked to see if the memory context or states for both cases
are compatible. If they aren't, then feel free to bring along two sets
of code.

Regards.

-Thomas

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Philip Warner 2000-07-28 14:41:52 pg_dump & performance degradation
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2000-07-28 14:34:08 Re: ALTER TABLE has not effect on children tables?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Philip Warner 2000-07-28 14:41:52 pg_dump & performance degradation
Previous Message Philip Warner 2000-07-28 14:30:56 Security choices...