Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: autovauum integration patch: Attempt #4

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>,PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: autovauum integration patch: Attempt #4
Date: 2004-07-24 03:25:24
Message-ID: 398.1090639524@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
"Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> writes:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> I'm not sure whether we can allow int8 columns in system tables, for 
>> portability reasons.

> Someone will have to tell me if this is really a problem,

Depending on int8 to actually work is right out.

I'd go with float or double depending on your precision needs.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Matthew T. O'ConnorDate: 2004-07-24 06:59:51
Subject: Re: autovauum integration patch: Attempt #4
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-07-24 02:23:04
Subject: Re: autovauum integration patch: Attempt #4

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group