Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: jdbc large object support ??

From: John Thorhauer <jthorhauer(at)phoenixcolor(dot)com>
To: postgres-inter <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: jdbc large object support ??
Date: 2000-07-19 20:41:50
Message-ID: 3976128E.97AF0074@phoenixcolor.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces
Joachim Achtzehnter wrote:
> 
> Take a look at the mailing list archive. This question was discussed in
> great detail during the last couple of days. You use setBytes() and
> getBytes() instead of streams, for details see the archive.
> 

OK.  I looked at that and I saw someone mention something about using
the text type to store data.  What I am doing is trying to store xml
files in postgres.  So maybe a field of type "text" willl take care of
my needs.  What is the size limit on fields of type text?

Thanks,
John
-- 
********************************
** John Thorhauer
** jthorhauer(at)phoenixcolor(dot)com
********************************

In response to

Responses

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: Joachim AchtzehnterDate: 2000-07-19 20:57:11
Subject: Re: jdbc large object support ??
Previous:From: Joachim AchtzehnterDate: 2000-07-19 20:14:59
Subject: Re: jdbc large object support ??

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group