From: | fatih ozturk <ozturkfa(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Partitionin with check functions |
Date: | 2009-03-31 11:07:08 |
Message-ID: | 397285.75133.qm@web111503.mail.gq1.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Thank you
"Yes, it does. It might be worthwile to use
WHERE sel=123 AND mod(sel,6)=3
I think you could use a rule to add the mod() condition automatically.
"
this is great idea
But the problem is i did not accomplish to find a way to change query like
partitioning=# select * from mainlog where sel=22;
to
partitioning=# select * from mainlog where sel=22 and mod(sel,6)=4;
"on select" rules just creates views, dont routes the queries.
I cant use tirggers for selects.
Is there exists a way of changing select query before query plan generated?
Any ideas?
I am very appreciative for your answers and interest.
Thanks
--- On Mon, 3/30/09, Harald Fuchs <hari(dot)fuchs(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
From: Harald Fuchs <hari(dot)fuchs(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Partitionin with check functions
To: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Date: Monday, March 30, 2009, 4:08 PM
In article <2499(dot)1238420859(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> In particular, a constraint like "sel=123" is *not* going to lead the
> planner to draw any conclusions about the value of "mod(sel,6)".
> Now, if you'd written "WHERE mod(sel,6)=3", I think it would draw
> the right conclusions.
Yes, it does. It might be worthwile to use
WHERE sel=123 AND mod(sel,6)=3
I think you could use a rule to add the mod() condition automatically.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Agustin Ignacio Genoves | 2009-03-31 11:31:43 | Re: Data type to store files |
Previous Message | Marc Abbott | 2009-03-31 08:21:28 | PG Patch |