Re: Inefficiency in recent pgtz patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Inefficiency in recent pgtz patch
Date: 2005-05-29 15:18:40
Message-ID: 3968.1117379920@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> writes:
> Do you agree that using a hashtable for it in general is a good idea
> assuming this sideeffect is removed, though?

I have no problem with the hashtable, only with preloading it with
everything. What I'd like to see is that the table inherited at fork()
contains just the data for the default timezone. (At least in the
normal case where that setting hasn't been changed since postmaster
start.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Fuhr 2005-05-29 15:19:54 pg_buffercache causes assertion failure
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-05-29 15:15:49 Re: Escape handling in COPY, strings, psql