Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Inefficiency in recent pgtz patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Inefficiency in recent pgtz patch
Date: 2005-05-29 15:18:40
Message-ID: 3968.1117379920@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
"Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> writes:
> Do you agree that using a hashtable for it in general is a good idea
> assuming this sideeffect is removed, though?

I have no problem with the hashtable, only with preloading it with
everything.  What I'd like to see is that the table inherited at fork()
contains just the data for the default timezone.  (At least in the
normal case where that setting hasn't been changed since postmaster
start.)

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Michael FuhrDate: 2005-05-29 15:19:54
Subject: pg_buffercache causes assertion failure
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-05-29 15:15:49
Subject: Re: Escape handling in COPY, strings, psql

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group