2010/2/1  <wyx6fox(at)sina(dot)com>:

> yet, this code is just for fun , why ? because i found this code in one
> article:PostgreSQL Concurrency Issues .

I'm not familiar with the "code" that you are referring to.  Do you
have a hyper-link to it?


> Tom Lane
> Red Hat Database Group
> Red Hat, Inc.

Also, I'm not sure why you mentioned Tom's name here.  Does he have
anything to do with the "code" that you've previously mentioned?

> so many design should be better than this , But now we should talk about
> this ,I just want talk about confick update on concurrency write
> transaction.

Regarding the update conflict, what aspect of it did you want to talk
about?  Also, so that others (having much more experience that I do)
can participate in this discussion please reply-all to the email.
This will ensure that the pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org mailing is
included.


-- 
Regards,
Richard Broersma Jr.

Visit the Los Angeles PostgreSQL Users Group (LAPUG)
http://pugs.postgresql.org/lapug

Responses

• Re: Re: 回复：Re: [PERFORM] the jokes for pg concurrency write performance at 2010-02-02 19:58:40 from Tom Lane

pgsql-performance by date

Next:	From: Greg Stark	Date: 2010-02-02 16:08:53
	Subject: Re: use pgsql in a big project, but i found pg has some big problem on concurrency write operation, maybe a joke for myself !
Previous:	From: Edgardo Portal	Date: 2010-02-02 13:06:46
	Subject: Re: Slow-ish Query Needs Some Love