Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Wanted: new project slogan

From: Richard Broersma <richard(dot)broersma(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Michael Alan Brewer <mbrewer(at)gmail(dot)com>, Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele(dot)bartolini(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Wanted: new project slogan
Date: 2010-01-28 22:02:47
Message-ID: 396486431001281402qc3a5fd4l32097f8210d2952d@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Marc G. Fournier <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> wrote:

>> If we don't, then that's not a reason to change. It can't both be a
>> reason to change, and then not a reason to change...
>>
>> (FWIW, I think it's not a reason to change away from what we have now)
>
> I didn't realize that it was the original reason to change, but if it is, I
> think its a pretty lame reason ... I thought we were just looking for
> something new to 'spice things up' a bit ...

The other reason to remove the work 'advanced' was to connotation with
'complicated'.  Which is suggested is a turn-off more some of the
emerging development trends.


-- 
Regards,
Richard Broersma Jr.

Visit the Los Angeles PostgreSQL Users Group (LAPUG)
http://pugs.postgresql.org/lapug

In response to

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Greg SmithDate: 2010-01-28 22:15:17
Subject: Re: Wanted: new project slogan
Previous:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2010-01-28 22:00:09
Subject: Re: Wanted: new project slogan

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group