Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Pet Peeves?

From: Richard Broersma <richard(dot)broersma(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Pet Peeves?
Date: 2009-01-29 15:46:13
Message-ID: 396486430901290746w3d5a618ds426161b6abcfdb79@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 5:16 AM, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:

> So, what do people say? Is Postgres perfect in your world or does it do some
> things which rub you the wrong way?

I would like to see the SQL92 feature for allowing sub-queries in
CHECK constraints, instead of marking this feature as "intentionally
omitted".
-- 
Regards,
Richard Broersma Jr.

Visit the Los Angeles PostgreSQL Users Group (LAPUG)
http://pugs.postgresql.org/lapug

In response to

  • Pet Peeves? at 2009-01-29 13:16:17 from Gregory Stark

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Gregory StarkDate: 2009-01-29 15:51:09
Subject: Re: Text search segmentation fault
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2009-01-29 15:46:08
Subject: Re: Changing owner of pg_toast tables

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group