Tim Perdue wrote:
> 
> On wednesday or thursday, I'm going to be publishing my article on MySQL
> vs. Postgres on PHPBuilder.com.

Cool!

> Features:
> Postgres is undoubtedly far, far more advanced than MySQL is. Postgres
> now supports foreign keys, which can help with referential integrity.
> Postgres supports subselects and better support for creating tables as
> the result of queries. The "transaction" support that MySQL lacks is
> included in Postgres, although you'll never miss it on a website, unless
> you're building something for a bank, and if you're doing that, you'll
> use oracle.

Since MySQL version 3.23.16 it supports transactions with sleepycats DB3
and since version 3.23.19 it is under the GPL.

-Egon

-- 
SIX Offene Systeme GmbH · Stuttgart  -  Berlin  -  New York
Sielminger Straße 63   ·    D-70771 Leinfelden-Echterdingen
Fon +49 711 9909164 · Fax +49 711 9909199 http://www.six.de
PHP-Stand auf Europas grösster Linux-Messe: 'LinuxTag 2001'
weitere Infos @ http://www.dynamic-webpages.de/

In response to

• Article on MySQL vs. Postgres at 2000-07-04 19:42:31 from Tim Perdue

Responses

• Re: Article on MySQL vs. Postgres at 2000-07-05 13:00:53 from Peter Galbavy

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2000-07-04 19:52:30
	Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Fwd: Problem with recv syscall on socket when other side closed connection
Previous:	From: Mikheev, Vadim	Date: 2000-07-04 19:47:32
	Subject: RE: Article on MySQL vs. Postgres