Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Server process exited with status 139 (meaning?)

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Ed Loehr <eloehr(at)austin(dot)rr(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pghackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Server process exited with status 139 (meaning?)
Date: 2000-06-26 05:30:40
Message-ID: 3956EA80.730B5D8F@alumni.caltech.edu (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> I'll assume you tried my latest typo-free version on an HP box after
> posting this and got the same results (i.e., nothing).  Maybe someone
> else would care to verify on a Linux box?  I'm on RH 6.2 with dual
> PIII's...

I see the latest being formally rejected down in the Executor. So
something is better than in the beta, but the plan being generated is
not quite right apparently.

                - Thomas

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Constantin TeodorescuDate: 2000-06-26 06:10:03
Subject: Re: pgaccess installation layout
Previous:From: Ed LoehrDate: 2000-06-26 05:29:37
Subject: Re: ExecInitIndexScan: both left and right ops are rel-vars

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group