> > Will anybody want to use this when TOAST comes to be?
> 1. There's no any TOAST at the moment.
I wasn't implying the patch is bad. Only wondering out load if toast
will be a super-set of large objects.
> 2. For really large objects TOAST will be really inefficient for quite small < 64K other
> way around.
Why will toast be inefficient for really large objects?
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Denis Perchine||Date: 2000-06-13 08:51:08|
|Subject: Re: Patch for better large objects support|
|Previous:||From: Denis Perchine||Date: 2000-06-13 08:37:58|
|Subject: Patch 0.2 for Re: [HACKERS] Caching number of blocks in relation to avoi lseek.|