Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Patch for better large objects support

From: Chris Bitmead <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com>
To: Denis Perchine <dyp(at)perchine(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Patch for better large objects support
Date: 2000-06-13 08:45:27
Message-ID: 3945F4A7.6D71B2E6@bitmead.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
> > Will anybody want to use this when TOAST comes to be?
> 
> 1. There's no any TOAST at the moment.

I wasn't implying the patch is bad. Only wondering out load if toast
will be a super-set of large objects.

> 2. For really large objects TOAST will be really inefficient for quite small < 64K other
> way around.

Why will toast be inefficient for really large objects?

In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Denis PerchineDate: 2000-06-13 08:51:08
Subject: Re: Patch for better large objects support
Previous:From: Denis PerchineDate: 2000-06-13 08:37:58
Subject: Patch 0.2 for Re: [HACKERS] Caching number of blocks in relation to avoi lseek.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group