Re: Help with gram.y (UNDER)

From: Chris Bitmead <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com>
To: Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Help with gram.y (UNDER)
Date: 2000-05-24 13:33:59
Message-ID: 392BDA47.FE1E7686@bitmead.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


It seems like bison is confused by having that '(' just after an
optional syntax (UNION). If I place something after OptUnder (USING just
to pick a token), then everything works fine (except of course the
spurious USING becomes part of the syntax).

Does the '(' have some kind of second-class status as a token that would
cause this wierdness?

Chris Bitmead wrote:
>
> Can someone give be a bit of help with gram.y to get this UNDER syntax
> right? I did what I though was the obvious syntax, but it no longer
> accepts a plain create table after this change...
>
> OptUnder: UNDER relation_name_list { $$ = $2; }
> | /*EMPTY*/ { $$ = NIL; }
> ;
>
> CreateStmt: CREATE OptTemp TABLE relation_name OptUnder '('
> OptTableElementList ')' OptInherit
> {
> /*etc */
> }
> ;
>
> The full patch is here...
> ftp://ftp.tech.com.au/pub/diff.x

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Trond Eivind=?iso-8859-1?q?_Glomsr=F8d?= 2000-05-24 13:39:49 Re: Perl 5.6.0
Previous Message Chris Bitmead 2000-05-24 13:10:23 Help with gram.y (UNDER)