| From: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Mount <petermount(at)it(dot)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-interfaces <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Peter Mount (Home)" <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status |
| Date: | 2000-05-02 11:15:46 |
| Message-ID: | 390EB8E2.6EE3D2DA@alumni.caltech.edu |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces |
> Not to bug you Peter, but 7.0 may not wait three days before release.
I would vote that this is important enough that it should wait, but no
one has raised the issue until now so we haven't discussed it. The
docs may or may not be completed within the next day (still jet-lagged
from vacation, but waking up at 3am does leave some extra time in the
morning, eh?), and if they stretch an extra day which is certainly
possible then we are only talking about an extra day for this. No big
deal in the grand scheme of things...
Peter, is there some testing that could/should be done with the new
driver (by others) in the meantime, or is it pretty likely to be
reasonably hashed out?
- Thomas
--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Mount | 2000-05-02 11:30:40 | RE: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-05-02 11:14:38 | Re: psql \l error |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Mount | 2000-05-02 11:30:40 | RE: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status |
| Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2000-05-02 11:07:37 | Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status |