Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Hmm, I'm confused. The timestamp type doesn't actually have a time zone
> stored, does it? Why did you want it to be dumped as "timestamp with time
> zone" then?
Andreas pointed that out awhile ago. I'm inclined to agree: equating
timestamp to timestamp with time zone is dead wrong, and we should
revert that pg_dump change.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-docs by date
|Next:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2001-02-17 16:34:57|
|Subject: Re: Undocumented datetime functions|
|Previous:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2001-02-17 14:50:50|
|Subject: Re: Annotatable on-line documentation|