Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
>> ...and for emphasis: this optimization of SeqScans is not possible with
>> any other database system, so its a big win for PostgreSQL.
> With any other db system? That's a big call. Why?
One could equally well spin it negatively, as "this optimization is not
needed with any other database" ...
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2005-11-26 17:57:01|
|Subject: Re: gprof SELECT COUNT(*) results|
|Previous:||From: Dennis Bjorklund||Date: 2005-11-26 16:26:35|
|Subject: Re: SHOW ALL output too wide|