Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Book and TEMP vs. TEMPORARY

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Book and TEMP vs. TEMPORARY
Date: 2000-04-06 16:45:39
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> > TEMPORARY is SQL92 standard, TEMP is not.  Nuff said...
> OK, but TEMPORARY doesn't work on 6.5.*, right?

Sure it does (at least as far as I can tell. The test/locale stuff has
screwed up CVS update, so I have to do a clean checkout of at least
that directory to get my tree back in shape :(

And, to beat a dead horse, I'm *still* not sure why we are carrying
along the "TEMP" variant, losing the use of that name for other

                     - Thomas

Thomas Lockhart				lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2000-04-06 17:10:12
Subject: Vacuuming temporary tables
Previous:From: Karel ZakDate: 2000-04-06 16:42:41
Subject: RE: pg_dumplo, thanks :) (fwd)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group