Re: Book and TEMP vs. TEMPORARY

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Book and TEMP vs. TEMPORARY
Date: 2000-04-06 16:45:39
Message-ID: 38ECBF33.8E12BF00@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > TEMPORARY is SQL92 standard, TEMP is not. Nuff said...
> OK, but TEMPORARY doesn't work on 6.5.*, right?

Sure it does (at least as far as I can tell. The test/locale stuff has
screwed up CVS update, so I have to do a clean checkout of at least
that directory to get my tree back in shape :(

And, to beat a dead horse, I'm *still* not sure why we are carrying
along the "TEMP" variant, losing the use of that name for other
things.

- Thomas

--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-04-06 17:10:12 Vacuuming temporary tables
Previous Message Karel Zak 2000-04-06 16:42:41 RE: pg_dumplo, thanks :) (fwd)