Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "'pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-sql(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh
Date: 2000-03-01 06:14:51
Message-ID: 38BCB55B.AC175BB9@alumni.caltech.edu (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-sql
> So are we willing to field questions from people trying to use TEMP
> tables and trying TEMP and not TEMPORARY.  I realize the restriction on
> a field called TEMP, but we don't get those very often.  How many people
> are going to guess TEMP and not TEMPORARY?

Well, that's one reason to stick to a published standard. No guessing
required since one could look it up ;)

                  - Thomas

-- 
Thomas Lockhart				lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2000-03-01 06:18:41
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh
Previous:From: Hiroshi InoueDate: 2000-03-01 05:56:43
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Bug report for 7.0beta1 in 'CREATE FUNCTION...'

pgsql-sql by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2000-03-01 06:18:41
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh
Previous:From: Christopher SawtellDate: 2000-03-01 03:26:24
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group