> Thomas made his, IMHO already complained because crippling
> the user interface in a not stdconforming way. My one is a
> bad hack and therefore deprecated by definition.
I did not claim to have the final form; I ran out of time before
heading out on vacation. istm that solving the general case by
unrolling clauses should not be exhaustively difficult. I will
continue to pursue this as time permits.
> Let's look at all three possible implementations for 7.0 and
> judge after.
Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2000-02-29 05:59:12|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh|
|Previous:||From: Thomas Lockhart||Date: 2000-02-29 05:48:12|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns