| From: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jan Wieck <wieck(at)debis(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: NOT {NULL|DEFERRABLE} (was: bug in 7.0) |
| Date: | 2000-02-29 05:54:56 |
| Message-ID: | 38BB5F30.F106C512@alumni.caltech.edu |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Thomas made his, IMHO already complained because crippling
> the user interface in a not stdconforming way. My one is a
> bad hack and therefore deprecated by definition.
I did not claim to have the final form; I ran out of time before
heading out on vacation. istm that solving the general case by
unrolling clauses should not be exhaustively difficult. I will
continue to pursue this as time permits.
> Let's look at all three possible implementations for 7.0 and
> judge after.
Sounds good.
- Thomas
--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-02-29 05:59:12 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh |
| Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2000-02-29 05:48:12 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiples |